Evaluation Report
Score overview and question-level quality findings.
61 / 86 points
| Key | Category | Question | Result | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| q_1_1 | Greeting | Did the agent greet the customer according to the protocol? | Yes | 1/1 | |
Detail: Opening includes salam, agent identity, and assistance offer: “আসসালামু আলাইকুম, সাজিয়া বলছি। আজকে আপনাকে কীভাবে সহযোগিতা করতে পারি?” | |||||
| q_1_2 | Greeting | Did the agent greet with friendly/ welcoming tone? | Yes | 2/2 | |
Detail: Greeting is respectful and welcoming in wording and flow, with a clear service-oriented opening. | |||||
| q_2_1 | Knowledge | Did the agent use verbal probing questions to understand to validated the caller's need * | Yes | 5/5 | |
Detail: Agent asked one relevant clarification about whether the previous call was on the same issue, then understood the need: 3G SIM to 4G upgrade channel/process. | |||||
| q_2_2 | Knowledge | Did the agent use System probing questions to understand to validated the caller's need/security probing * | N/A | -/- | |
Detail: No Robi system/API/security-verification metadata supplied, so system/security probing is not auditable in current phase. | |||||
| q_2_3 | Knowledge | Did the agent provide complete information? * | No | 0/15 | |
Detail: Use case is SIM 4G upgrade/replacement. Agent correctly said call-center cannot process it and mentioned customer care/retailer point/Doorstep plus NID and biometric, but missed mandatory charge information for SIM replacement/4G upgrade (BDT 350 standard) and did not clearly specify approved service point as Robi Sheba/biometric retail point. | |||||
| q_2_4 | Knowledge | Did the agent close the call with Expertise? (timely manner) * | Yes | 6/6 | |
Detail: Handling was organized and timely. Agent understood the issue, clearly stated call-center limitation, and gave feasible next steps: customer care/retailer point or Doorstep if available. | |||||
| q_2_5 | Knowledge | Did the agent ensured all the necessary additional information * | Yes | 4/4 | |
Detail: Automatic Yes by rule because q_2_3 is No; additional-information criterion is not evaluated separately. | |||||
| q_3_1 | Soft Skill | Did the agent actively listen to the caller? | Yes | 3/3 | |
Detail: Customer did not need to repeat the same issue twice due to agent misunderstanding; agent understood after one clarification and responded to the actual request. | |||||
| q_3_2 | Soft Skill | Did the agent interrupt the caller? | Yes | 3/3 | |
Detail: No confirmed disruptive interruption. Turn transitions appear natural, and no evidence shows the agent cut off an unfinished customer thought. | |||||
| q_3_3 | Soft Skill | Did the agent show friendliness (positive tonality/ empathy/ courtesy) during the call? | Yes | 13/13 | |
Detail: Agent remained polite and courteous throughout, using respectful address and apology language such as “দুঃখিত, স্যার” and closing warmly. | |||||
| q_3_4 | Soft Skill | Did the agent use magic words during the call? | Yes | 2/2 | |
Detail: Total opportunities: 4; covered opportunities: 4; critical miss status: none. Magic words used at clarification/request (“কানলি”), limitation/negative answer (“দুঃখিত”), and closing (“মোস্ট ওয়েলকাম”, “ধন্যবাদ”, “ভালো থাকবেন”). | |||||
| q_3_5 | Soft Skill | Did the agent have appropriate energy/ liveliness/ confidence throughout the call? | Yes | 6/6 | |
Detail: Agent was responsive and confident, with no unexplained delay above 8 seconds. Responses followed customer turns promptly and delivery was clear and professional. | |||||
| q_3_6 | Soft Skill | Did the agent demostrated good sentence construction and correct pronounciation? | No | 0/10 | |
Detail: Sentence construction becomes materially broken/undisciplined in places, e.g. “বর্তমানে ম্যানুয়ালি এটি করার পথ—মানে, সুযোগ থাকছে না,” which is awkward and poorly formed. No clear pronunciation failure evidence, but sentence-construction failure alone makes this No. | |||||
| q_3_7 | Soft Skill | Did the agent provide information which is completely understood by customer/ auditor in terms of pace and pitch? | Yes | 10/10 | |
Detail: Agent word count: 67; agent speaking duration: 29.34 seconds; calculated WPM: 137.01; threshold comparison: 137.01 <= 350, so Yes. | |||||
| q_3_8 | Soft Skill | Did the agent avoid using jargon (Internal technical term)? | Yes | 2/2 | |
Detail: Agent avoided internal jargon; terms used were customer-facing and understandable. | |||||
| q_3_9 | Soft Skill | Did the agent personalize the call? | Yes | 2/2 | |
Detail: Agent personalized the call with respectful address multiple times, using “স্যার.” | |||||
| q_3_10 | General | Did the agent follow the right call transfer/ hold protocol? | N/A | -/- | |
Detail: Current-phase N/A by policy; hold/transfer protocol is excluded from scoring. | |||||
| q_4_1 | Closure | Did the agent comprehend at the end of the call? | Yes | 1/1 | |
Detail: Customer explicitly confirmed understanding and initiated closure: “ওকে ম্যাডাম, ওকে বুঝতে পারছি। ওকে, থ্যাঙ্ক ইউ ম্যাডাম।” | |||||
| q_4_2 | Closure | Did the agent close the call according as per script | Yes | 1/1 | |
Detail: Agent gave a polite professional closing: “মোস্ট ওয়েলকাম... ধন্যবাদ, ভালো থাকবেন স্যার। আসসালামু আলাইকুম।” | |||||
| q_5_1 | Wrap up | Did the agent capture all information correctly and completely in CRM? | N/A | -/- | |
Detail: No CRM/CQC/wrap-up metadata supplied, so this is not auditable in current phase. | |||||